HORMUZ SIGNAL

Watch the strait, not the statements. A composite 0–100 gauge of Iran-conflict escalation risk built from shipping, energy, and conflict data.

Methodology

The thesis

Presidential rhetoric and diplomatic headlines are noisy signals — they are cheap to produce and often decoupled from what the parties actually do. Hormuz Signal instead watches the physical and financial plumbing of the conflict: whether commercial shipping still moves through the Strait of Hormuz and the Red Sea, whether China keeps buying discounted Iranian crude, and whether global oil and refined-product inventories keep tightening. These are costly signals — shippers, underwriters, and refiners reveal real expectations through where they send hulls and how they price risk.

How the score is computed

  1. Each indicator's latest value is converted to a raw stress reading relative to a peacetime baseline. For up-bad indicators (prices, rates, premiums, event counts) stress is (value − baseline) / span; for down-bad indicators (transits, imports, inventories) it is (baseline − value) / span.
  2. Raw stress is clamped to the 0–1 range and scaled to 0–100, where 0 means calm and 100 means maximum stress.
  3. The composite score is the weighted average of the normalized stresses. Indicators with no current data are excluded and the remaining weights are renormalized to sum to 1, so a missing feed never silently drags the score toward zero.
  4. The result is rounded to one decimal and mapped to a risk level.

Risk levels

LevelScore rangeInterpretation
Low0 – 19.9Shipping, energy flows, and event tempo near peacetime norms.
Guarded20 – 39.9Isolated stress in one or two series; the system retains ample buffer.
Elevated40 – 59.9Multiple series under stress; markets are pricing a meaningful risk premium.
High60 – 79.9Shipping constrained and inventories tightening; escalation is materially likely.
Severe80 – 100Broad-based disruption across shipping, energy, and conflict indicators.

Indicators

Nine series, weighted by how directly they measure escalation pressure. Baseline is the peacetime reference value; span is the distance from baseline that maps to maximum stress.

IndicatorWeightDirectionBaselineSpanSource
Hormuz tanker transits
Daily commercial vessel transits through the Strait of Hormuz (all vessel types, PortWatch n_total). A sustained drop means shipping is being constrained — the single most direct escalation signal. Baseline reflects the observed pre-war normal (~95-100/day, Feb 2026).
transits/day
22%↓ worse100.050.0IMF PortWatch (satellite AIS)
Red Sea / Bab el-Mandeb transits
Daily commercial transits through the Bab el-Mandeb strait (all vessel types, PortWatch n_total). Constraints here signal a widening regional shipping crisis (Houthi attacks, rerouting around the Cape).
transits/day
12%↓ worse55.030.0IMF PortWatch (satellite AIS)
China imports of Iranian crude
Chinese purchases of discounted Iranian crude, proxied by China's officially reported crude imports from Malaysia (the known relabelling channel — direct China–Iran reporting stopped in 2021). If Beijing keeps buying, Tehran retains its revenue lifeline; a collapse signals severe pressure and raises escalation risk.
kb/d
10%↓ worse1,400700.0UN Comtrade public preview (China imports from Malaysia as relabelled-Iran proxy)
US commercial crude stocks (excl. SPR)
US commercial crude inventories. Tightening inventories mean the market has less buffer against a Gulf supply shock.
mbbl
10%↓ worse450.060.0EIA Weekly Petroleum Status Report
US distillate fuel oil stocks
US distillate (diesel/heating oil) inventories. Refined-product tightness amplifies any crude disruption.
mbbl
6%↓ worse118.030.0EIA Weekly Petroleum Status Report
Brent crude front month
Brent front-month price. A geopolitical risk premium building into prices reflects trader expectations of supply disruption. Span widened Sep 2026 ($120 → $150 cap) so a full-scale-war price regime still has headroom.
USD/bbl
14%↑ worse78.072.0Yahoo Finance (BZ=F)
VLCC rate TD3C (MEG to China)
Very Large Crude Carrier earnings on the Middle East Gulf to China route, from the CME-listed TD3C Baltic freight future (front month, Worldscale converted to USD/day). Spiking rates reflect scarcity of willing tonnage and rising risk.
USD/day
8%↑ worse45,00055,000CME TD3C Baltic freight future (NYMEX:TL via TradingView scanner)
Gulf war-risk insurance premium
Additional war-risk premium charged for transiting the Gulf, as % of hull value. No public price series exists (quotes are bilateral), so the level is estimated from the Lloyd's Joint War Committee listed-areas status and war-risk coverage tempo, calibrated to press-reported quotes. Underwriters price danger before headlines do. Recalibrated Aug 2026 to the post-escalation market (quotes of 3–10%).
% hull value
10%↑ worse0.259.75Lloyd's JWC listed areas + GDELT coverage tempo (modelled estimate)
Conflict coverage tempo, Gulf (7d)
Trailing 7-day count of English-language conflict-related articles about the Gulf / Hormuz / Red Sea (GDELT timelinevolraw). A media-tempo proxy for conflict intensity, not an event count — used because it reacts within hours. Recalibrated Sep 2026 to the measured range (~1.9k calm-week floor, ~8.9k peak, Aug 2026); the original 25/55 calibration pinned the indicator at maximum stress permanently.
articles
8%↑ worse1,5006,500GDELT

Caveats

  • Several series (tanker rates, war-risk premiums, Chinese imports of Iranian crude) have no free real-time public feed; they rely on proxies or periodic reporting and may lag events by days.
  • Weights, baselines, and spans are analytical judgments, not fitted parameters. The score is a structured way to read the data, not a forecast.
  • A 0–100 score implies false precision. Treat the level band and the trend of the components as the signal, not the decimal.